>>2979 Unironically, read puranavid's essay on his blog about islam and hinduism. He absolutely demolishes abrahamicism there

>>2980 link?

>>2979 Become athiest life is free

>>2982 If life is free, then why dont you atheists get one?

>>2979 islam is very simple and appeals to basic human instincts, 1 god, no idols, have discipline, try to pray 5 times, fast ramadan, give charity occasionally, be protective of your female relaives, avoid degeneracy, keep mindful of god at all times, be wary of satan's temptations, we are all sons of adam..etc hinduism is so full of mumbo jumbo metaphysics, fake hippie spiritualism, there's a lot of mental hoops, no real unified scriptural standard, thousands of weird rituals depending on region (admittedly sufis and shia too, but they are unorthodox) it's also hilarious to me that people think if they convert then will lose connection to their heritage, meanwhile ramayana/mahabharata is the national epic of indonesia/malaysia, you can respect the artistic value of a national epic without literally believing in monkey man and pig man

>>2979 You don't fear death in Hinduism Ek aur baat, you will be wajib ul qatl if you try to leave Islam. Also there is either eternal hell or heaven . No in-between

>>2987 Go get a life ,varaha and hanuman which you call pig man and monkey man are better in character than anything Islam presents . Also, there are many sects in Islam also , and I don't know about other places but the subcontinent people if they convert to other religion try so hard to ape the Arabs or Europe . They try to disassociate themselves very very hard . If not op , then his son or his son. Once he goes to that path we Hindus will lose another lineage and gain another enemy. To the op : read the epics , read bhagwad gita and bhagwad puran .

>>2979 You want to be a traitor to your people ? Your children will grow up hating on hindus and others .It is inevitable. Think well before you attempt anything .

>>2991 >varaha and hanuman which you call pig man and monkey man are better in character yes those dieties i didn't know their names (i'm moroccan), my point is you can like any character you want, liking a character doesn't mean it's mandatory to literally believe they exist, you can like something while believing it is fictional >there are many sects in Islam there is sunni and shia, everything else is irrelevant, sunni are 90%+ while shia are just a weird minority aside from a couple countries, within sunni the maliki hanafi etc are basically interchangeable legal standards and not really sects in a theological sense >try so hard to ape the Arabs and try to disassociate not really, they still do dowry, most celebrate diwali and holi, atleast until recently, rub haldi durring wedding, muslims are represented among sanskrit scholars too, obviously if there are RSS/Bajrang goons using jai sri ram to harass people and communal media stoking the religious cord to distract from other issues, then you will feel less inclined to study ramayana, if you have Pancasila like indonesia then communalism would be banned and everyone would be forced to respect national components

>>2990 >there is either eternal hell or heaven .No in-between there is temporary hell for muslim sinners who will be burned until their soul is purified then taken to heaven, there is also a sort of purgatory or "cold hell" where people who didn't recieve dawah or recieved it but didn't undertand will be tested.

>>2991 >grow up hating on hindus only if hindus attack them or drive them out, otherwise it's advised to deal kindly and fairly with other religions and respect their gods

>>2995 >otherwise it's advised to deal kindly and fairly with other religions and respect their gods oh the irony

>>2996 ??

>>2997 weren't muslim barbarians historically the reason for destruction of majority of polythiest and pagan religions religion intolerance literally started with abrahamism and got further amplified by the rise of islam saying that the sky is pink would be more believable than thinking that muslims deal kindly with other religions

>>2998 >weren't muslim barbarians historically the reason for destruction of majority of polythiest and pagan religions you think all the illiterate turkic steppe barbarians who raided india gave a fuck about islam ? the ghurids literally had lakshmi minted on their coins, they just wanted to loot, like the kushans, huns, scythians, parthians..etc before them who also invaded india, so they used whatever bullshit justification to do so. for example timur (ancestor of babur) when he wanted to loot damascus in 1400 he gathered a bunch of shia scholars and made them declare that damascus should be destroyed because their ancestors supposedly killed hussain according to shias, so he used it as an excuse to massacre everyone, even though timur was sunni so this should have been irrelevant, if you read baburnama you will realize babur wasn't very religious and gave 0 fucks about invading india he just wanted ferghana but the uzbeks kicked him out so getting rich in india was plan B this is in stark contrast to how the rashidun caliphs acted, for example when umar conquered iraq to catch the lakhmid nobles he had no intention of conquering persia and just wanted a peace treaty, but they kept launching counter attacks so he sent his army to punish them, who pursued the fleeing sassanids until their whole empire was conquered, there was never a recorded concerted effort to destroy zoroastrianism, it just wasn't very ingrained and eventually fell out of favor >religion intolerance literally started with abrahamism how do you think the ancient egyptians wiped out atenism ? how did bihar go from buddhist to hindu ? why do you think the zoroastrian clergy killed mazdak and his followers ? obviously religious intolerance is not exclusive to abrahamic religions

>>3002 Too long of katua apologetics with zero idea about Aryans. Adi shankaracharya had 40 day debate with a rival saint .The wife of who was the judge . After the debate with with the man the wife herself debated for 7 more days and finally accepted defeat and accepted shankaracharya as the guru instead of chimping out an killing any intellectuals that happened throughout history of pisslam. That's the story of budhism end in India. Usual abrahamic retard think its because budhiat was proven wrong .no. It was the disciples of Buddhism who proven to not understand Buddhism and had lost the path. There is no relegion in India there is no concept of it. All ism it semitic mental retardation applied on Aryans. Dharma is absolute and eternal since OM of Vedas to OM of latest Guru granth. There was no end of dharma ever in land of aryavarta. Semitic relehions are founded on intolerance and exclusivity. God of Israel came to hate the Egyptians and gave nothing to jews .The first thing he does is curse non jews .Jews are chosen people ,mudslime call everyone infidel ,only Christians go to heaven. Comparing vile hatred of abrahamic relegions has seeped into minds masses to some random kings fighting over lands is laughable. Semites were understood for what they are 100s years ago,mental gymnastics won't take you anywhere

>>2995 If this relegion is anything but farce I would apply it on Hindu .So Hindu are genuine to hate on intolerant mudslimes who atta led and drive the Hindus out of Hindu kush mountains

>>2993 Communalism cannot be banned with pisslam. If communalism is banned then allah said not to befriend non mudslime will be removed ,killing infidels wherever you find them would be removed from quran. The relegion cease to exist when you ban communalism. > In before it was just for war saar Mudslime invading foreign lands is always at war with natives trying to defend What you propose by state ban on communalism is protection of vile hate filled katuas from the non Muslims because of course banning the communalism of pisslam is communal. Until he mudslimes can overthrow the state and kill the non Muslims. Exceptionally Jewish nature.

>>2994 This fundamentally makes pisslam useless for Aryans. Aryans dont seek pussies in heaven .Entire historical scriptures point to one thing ie being one with creator. Even if any of the mohammed larp is to be taken seriously,it is at best someone stuck half way through god realisation not worthy of being learned from.

>>2987 Islam is political ideology that bring down the creator to a puny level to make it easy to understand for nighers and hence controllable. Pisslam also thinks women are mere holes even in heaven ,its not anti degeneracy it is the degeneracy. And Ramayana and Mahabharata are not epics they are history .And only mudslime believe in monkey man and pig man being god we call them avatars .Unlike allah Brahm is capable in manifesting even in stone that he created let alone animals. Good point to discard allah from being god >We are all sons of adam That's a kike story though that is stolen from a older story of Gilgamesh that is stolen from the stroy of manu. Manu is actually the Sanskrit word from which the word man comes from which means "the first man" .Manu was saved by Vishnu avatar before allah was born

>>3005 >killing infidels wherever you find them disingenious people love to act appalled at this verse even though it's completely reasonable in context, here's the verse in context, from an 1861 translation by John Medows Rodwell so you won't say it's apologetics

>>3009 >le taqqiya

>>3010 i'm not shia

>>3009 >context Where ? Is that posted to convince or throw you out I dont get it >and fight for the cause of par brahm parmeshwar against who fight against you >and kill all Muslims wherever you find them ,and eject them from whatever place they have ejected you

>>2993 >obviously if there are RSS/Bajrang goons using jai sri ram to harass people and communal media stoking the religious cord to distract from other issues, then you will feel less inclined to study ramayana, if you have Pancasila like indonesia then communalism would be banned and everyone would be forced to respect national components RSS/Bajrang dal are based. Pooslims in india deserve worse.

>>2995 >only if hindus attack them or drive them out, otherwise it's advised to deal kindly and fairly with other religions and respect their gods Kek, stop getting your news from Al jazeera >>3002 >how did bihar go from buddhist to hindu ? For someone who doesn't know the name of Hanuman and Varaha yiu really shoulsnt

>>3043 *really shouldn't debate indian history with hindus k2we. Read up on shankaracharya

Go convert to pooslam. Nobody gives a shit